Views
Recorded Potentials 
We've all had 'em. Those studies where p = 0.08, or you couldn't reproduce someone else's findings, or your really interesting pilot study got lost amongst "more important" research priorities, never to be followed up on again. Perhaps your findings were negative and the null hypothesis is *gasp* true. Whatever the case, in their pursuit of an ever-increasing impact factor, journals invaribly eschew such findings, leaving a large, vital chunck of scientfic inquiry uncommunicated. In short, academic journals do not want this data.
We do.
The purpose of this site is to disseminate findings that, despite sound scientific method, do not reach threshold for traditional publication. A formal mission statement and specifics will soon follow. Input is welcomed.
Jeremy Biane 06:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
11/12/2010 - Ah ha! An EPSP!